To shift gears to something a little less controversial in here, the Environment. Despite Biden's confusing statement about having cancer, I think he is going the right direction with his environmental program, but I don't think it is nearly enough. He is essentially throwing a Dixie cup of water at bonfire. It's not a forest fire yet, but it will be if things don't change.
I would like to see something more comprehensive that includes changing agricultural practices as well. For example, in the 2020 documentary Kiss the Ground, researchers show increased productivity and reduced carbon release with no-till agriculture.
https://kisstheground.com/ (Kiss the Ground | Soil Health Solutions | Join the Movement!)
The same goes for promoting free range farming for the production of meat as well. Problem is most of these sustainable agricultural practices are not subsidized by the federal government to the rate that they should be. Instead the majority goes into monocrop production of corn and grain that isn't even used for human consumption.
The other mechanism is the reality of entry cost for alternative energy sources. Sure, windmills in the Gulf of Mexico is a good thing. But he just changed the regulations and not the funding. More so, solar panels on buildings are very expensive to implement. There are programs out that to help, but they are not cost effective when you take the total cost into consideration. More so, these manufacturing processes are not nearly as environmentally friendly as they should be.
I posted about green regulations in a different thread because I would like to know what are the best ideas out there to encourage or require environmentally friendly development practices. I don't think we can wait for the Feds to implement meaningful change and we as planners are in a position to make a difference now.