- Messages
- 8,254
- Points
- 57
It all depends on circumstances. A "custodial" speakership would be viewed differently than something longer term. Dems would also look for certain commitments to move on certain policies, ensure a reasonable degree of influence, etc. But there's also a very strong recognition that the GOP's house is on fire, and only they can put it out. The Dems owe them nothing. There's a reason they didn't act to save McCarthy--McCarthy was incredibly ineffective as speaker. The GOP being unable to govern functionally will damage them severely at the polls--they need to fix themselves and figure out how to neutralize a handful of bad actors in their party.Do you think there is any republican that would receive any votes from democrats?
If not, I don't think they would be looking for someone who would compromise outside of their own party.
At this point, I think there is benefit to a nonmember serving as speaker. Liz Cheney could probably get there with dem support. Mitt Romney as well. Jon Huntsman could be an option as well given his technocrat perspective. I actually think a former governor of some kind could be a good choice since it is like the House needs basic executive leadership to get/keep the machine moving like it is supposed to.