dw914er
Cyburbian
- Messages
- 2,237
- Points
- 36
Yes I know that, but the imbecile who posted it does not.
What's interesting is I thought she was a pretty hard Trump loyalist until his milktoast criticism.
Yes I know that, but the imbecile who posted it does not.
I live in S NH and travel to Boston a lot. I truly wish that red state voters could see some of these areas. I grew up in the rural South with counties that vote GOP 85/15. The worst parts of blue state cities are often nicer than 90% of red state towns/cities. Is government perfect? LOL, not even remotely. But is no government, no taxes, no revenue the answer, resoundingly not. You end up looking like most of the South and plains states. Barren ghost towns with poor roads, poor health outcomes, obesity rates higher than even American averages.Was on the east coast about six weeks ago, specifically in NYC and Boston, and I gotta admit, I fully understand why they are all pro-government Wokeheads, they got public transportation that works and is reliable. Imagine living day-to-day there reliant on government owned machines and vehicles and being like, umm, we need to stop Big Government intruding into our lives, our liberties are sacred and it's what matters most. SHEEESH!
It's not even political, really, its just factual.
In New England, I'd guess half of the Building Department staff (plans examiners, even counter staff, permit intake) to 2/3 are 'conservatives' and of this 2/3, 90% are silent because they know overall they're in 'enemy territory' (term used for effect not my feelings). But on the Planning and NGO side (LEAD programs, CDBG, Habitat) side it's maybe 5%.No conservatives actually work in local government do they? Besides like front like Street workers.
That was my main point, to be fair but yes, you're also correct.Well, to be fair, there are plenty of Blue Cities in the Rust Belt that are "Barren ghost towns with poor roads, poor health outcomes, obesity rates higher than even American averages." Perhaps it has more to do with loss of tax base and available revenue.
I grew up as a conservative and there are still al lot of the principals that I agree with. But not all and I always vote split ticket. I believe that there is no one party that best fits my personal fundamental beliefs and it drives people mad. They automatically assume that if I don't vote D, then I am an R, and if I don't vote R then I vote D.
However, I have worked with two conservative/libertarians in my department over the past few years. I have also worked with three liberals, one of which is also an environmentalist. They are all great people, open minded about others ideas and beliefs, and I appreciate the conversations that we have because it makes our community better.
That was my main point, to be fair but yes, you're also correct.
How we break the "taxes are evil" fever in America, I just do not know.
"It's" (i.e. it is contracted to it's) is the proper English here, but, hey, you know better than anyone else here - right, newbie?its just factual.
Leave me outta this, bro.@Bubba - you've never posted a typo here?
Like I’ve posted before, veterans with a discharge status that is anything but “honorable” generally bars them from receiving services and benefits. The veterans most in need of services are the ones that don’t have an honorable discharge. Congress makes the rules….That is good to hear. I guess CBS news did not fact check deep enough.
It still does not change my frustrations on how the federal government fails to provide adequate care and assistance for military veterans.
Leave me outta this, bro.
Anyhoo, I figured that was about the mildest criticism I could reply with to a post containing that overall level of ignorance. We're supposed to be welcoming and tolerant and stuff here, amirite?
You've stayed in your job so that you could be the best possible father to your 4 sons, who really have no other parental figure except for you.How long do I pretend? I feel lame somewhat for just staying in my job.
You've stayed in your job so that you could be the best possible father to your 4 sons, who really have no other parental figure except for you.
That's the OPPOSITE of lame!
Seems like SCOTUS is now a panel of medical experts, religious authorities, and geologists.For me the environment is a big issue. As cities we have signed consent decrees, etc. to modernize sewer systems, etc, but we allow cows to literally deficate in creeks and rivers.
I was signed up for a bike/swim even Sunday, but the swim portion was cancelled. E-Coli too high. That is pathetic. Our governor refuses to do anything. We have algae blooms, and a gulf dead zone (Why Louisiana doesn't sue the Upper Midwest is beyond me). Then the SCOTUS says the EPA is overreaching. My mayor and council support this governor a great deal. How long do I pretend? I feel lame somewhat for just staying in my job. I am trying to help a town that would probably hate me if they really knew me.
Of course you're totally just speaking rhetorically. As noted to the mods, I'll just be welcoming and tolerant and stuff.Not sure what is ignorant? For 50 years Southern red states (and I should know, I was born and raised and educated in one) have ranked in the bottom 10% of QOL measures while coastal blue states rank near the top. Now if you want to argue that you (rhetorical) don't care about stuff like access to health care or obesity, or whatever, for rhetorical YOU, that's fine. Plenty of people just want to shoot guns in their yards inside city limits or have a junkyard next to a public park, unfettered. (I'm generalizing, and speaking rhetorically, not TO you.)
So many people drive around with handguns in their cars. The police here talk about how often they have a handgun reported stolen from unlocked cars.^^It's a start at least.
Related: Recent news story that a veterinarian at Churchill Downs had his vehicle illegally entered (the window was down and the door unlocked so it wasn't a break-in) from which the perp took not one, but two handguns, from the glovebox. I wouldn't trust my horse's butt to some yahoo that drives around with two handguns in his glovebox. Jeez.
^^It's a start at least.
Related: Recent news story that a veterinarian at Churchill Downs had his vehicle illegally entered (the window was down and the door unlocked so it wasn't a break-in) from which the perp took not one, but two handguns, from the glovebox. I wouldn't trust my horse's butt to some yahoo that drives around with two handguns in his glovebox. Jeez.
At this point, there should be State and/or Federal law mandating some high minimum insurance requirements to own any gun.So many people drive around with handguns in their cars. The police here talk about how often they have a handgun reported stolen from unlocked cars.
It is a common sense requirement that if you own a firearm that you need to keep it secured because kids, unstable household members, criminals, etc. Now that electronic tracing is a thing, I hope the ATF can suss out straw buyers purchasing firearms for nefarious use. This remains a big issue for state with stringent gun control with firearms coming in from other states. 84% of the 3,200 firearms successfully traced in NJ during 2021 had origin states other than NJ. PA, GA, SC, VA, NC, FL combined were the source of 1,945 or 60% of firearms traced.The NC Governor is taking a practical step in the right direction when it come to securing firearms. This afternoon he will be announcing a new program called NC S.A.F.E with a focus on properly securing firearms, preventing thefts, and most importantly, preventing them from getting into the hands of others, especially kids. As a gun owner, I applaud this step forward. But it is only a step. I would like to see additional regulation requiring that all fire arms be sold with a locking case, trigger lock, or other method of securing the firearm. Not just for pistols, but for all firearms.
Here is the link to the program that the NC Governor will be announcing today:
NC S.A.F.E.
North Carolina, we have an urgent problem: Too many guns are falling into the wrong hands. If you own a firearm, make sure it’s safely secured. Lock it up. Keep it safe.www.ncsafe.org
That's the issue we in IL have coming from IN. You can literally cross a street on foot from IN into IL/City of Chicago.It is a common sense requirement that if you own a firearm that you need to keep it secured because kids, unstable household members, criminals, etc. Now that electronic tracing is a thing, I hope the ATF can suss out straw buyers purchasing firearms for nefarious use. This remains a big issue for state with stringent gun control with firearms coming in from other states. 84% of the 3,200 firearms successfully traced in NJ during 2021 had origin states other than NJ. PA, GA, SC, VA, NC, FL combined were the source of 1,945 or 60% of firearms traced.
NJ law enforcement calls those states the Iron Pipeline (I-95 corridor).That's the issue we in IL have coming from IN. You can literally cross a street on foot from IN to IL/City of Chicago.
I'm still amazed how gun control works so well for Hawaii though.NJ law enforcement calls those states the Iron Pipeline (I-95 corridor).
NJ law enforcement calls those states the Iron Pipeline (I-95 corridor).
Not sure what is ignorant? For 50 years Southern red states (and I should know, I was born and raised and educated in one) have ranked in the bottom 10% of QOL measures while coastal blue states rank near the top. Now if you want to argue that you (rhetorical) don't care about stuff like access to health care or obesity, or whatever, for rhetorical YOU, that's fine. Plenty of people just want to shoot guns in their yards inside city limits or have a junkyard next to a public park, unfettered. (I'm generalizing, and speaking rhetorically, not TO you.)
I continue to be amazed by this as well. The one cop I'm friends with often laments the idiots with their Glock and Sig Sauer stickers on the back window of their vehicles, "like they want someone to break into their car." His officers have even left notes on vehicles when they could actually see the gun through the window.So many people drive around with handguns in their cars. The police here talk about how often they have a handgun reported stolen from unlocked cars.
coming off as smug and elitist
Many on here are like that, so what's with the finger wagging?
Despite technology existing, the ATF is barred from having an electronic database to trace firearms to individuals. All traces between the gun manufacturer and retailer are straightforward, but after that the ATF has to review paper files. As you pointed out, a lot can happen between the first retail purchase and when a firearm is recovered during a crime. While I am sure that firearms are often stolen from legitimate owners, I also think there are people acting as straw buyers putting firearms on the black market. I personally think that there shouldn't be any unpermitted sales of firearms between private parties.That's strange, I hear I-95 be called the Prostitution Pipeline because of the amount of human trafficing that occurs along this major north-south corridor.
Additionally, The Bureau of Justice statistics claims that 10% of crime guns come from retail business, while 43% are bought on the street, most of which are illegal. The problem is how these guns are ending up on the market and a step in the right direction is having people properly secure their guns and not let unauthorized persons get access to them.
Despite technology existing, the ATF is barred from having an electronic database to trace firearms to individuals. All traces between the gun manufacturer and retailer are straightforward, but after that the ATF has to review paper files. As you pointed out, a lot can happen between the first retail purchase and when a firearm is recovered during a crime. While I am sure that firearms are often stolen from legitimate owners, I also think there are people acting as straw buyers putting firearms on the black market. I personally think that there shouldn't be any unpermitted sales of firearms between private parties.
I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that someone who chooses to own a firearm to store it responsibly, competently use the firearm, report it when it's stolen, and be held accountable if they don't.
Sorry, I always find that argument illogical. It basically says since guns are going to get stolen several times no matter what the legal gun owner does correctly then we shouldn't try to regulate guns sales because crime will happen anyway. I know it's not what you're saying, just an argument I don't like.The other element is guns are not just stollen from legal owners. When I was taking my CPL class in MI, they showed a study that was done in Chicago that indicated that pistols are often sold illegally or stollen multiple times before a crime is committed with them, even if the first owner who bought it legally did report it stollen. The moral of the story was to get everyone in their class to store their firearms properly.
Sorry, I always find that argument illogical. It basically says since guns are going to get stolen several times no matter what the legal gun owner does correctly then we shouldn't try to regulate guns sales because crime will happen anyway. I know it's not what you're saying, just an argument I don't like.
All I am going to say is that the right to privacy in matters of gun ownership is a specious argument given the overlaps that exist in terms of reproductive care access, LGBTQ+ issues, immigration, etc.![]()
Personal Info on California Gun Owners Wrongly Made Public
The California Department of Justice says it wrongly made public the personal information of perhaps hundreds of thousands of gun owners in up to six state-operated databases.www.nbcbayarea.com
In wake of Journal News publishing gun permit holder maps, nation sees push to limit access to gun records
AP Photo by Mike Groll Gun rights advocates demonstrate outside the Capitol in Albany, N.Y. on Feb. 28. The group rallied against the recently legislated NY SAFE Act and other measures they say infringe on their constitutional right to bear arms.www.rcfp.org
This is what many gun owners fear when it comes to registration.
Personally, I am not too worried about it. My guns are in safes, lock boxes, or on me, and I am the only one with access to them. Most of my neighbors know that I am a gun owner, and sure, one of them hates me because of it, but I really don't care. But I know others like their privacy and I respect that.
In regards to unpermitted sales, I agree. I think that there needs to be a structure regardless of where or when the sale is happening. In Michigan as an example, you can't just sell a pistol to anyone. You need to be an FFL or have a concealed carry license. Otherwise it needs to go through an FFL that does the background check. The downfall is there will always be people who will not follow the laws, no matter what they are. The other element is guns are not just stollen from legal owners. When I was taking my CPL class in MI, they showed a study that was done in Chicago that indicated that pistols are often sold illegally or stollen multiple times before a crime is committed with them, even if the first owner who bought it legally did report it stollen. The moral of the story was to get everyone in their class to store their firearms properly.
That's the best part of the OK program. It's a statewide virtual charter school run by the Catholic Church. Plus parents get tax incentives to use it. I'm sure it will get modelled across the country.Or at least they should get a school voucher so funding can be taken away from all the students attending public schools?
There is no way that deal is upheld. When you have the State Attorney General telling you it's unconstitutional you're on shaky ground to start. I wouldn't be too concerned about this one. And if somehow it is upheld, just try to open up an Islamic School and let the fun ensue.That's the best part of the OK program. It's a statewide virtual charter school run by the Catholic Church. Plus parents get tax incentives to use it. I'm sure it will get modelled across the country.
I mean the church has a stellar reputation and there is absolutely no way abusive parents could use virtual school to isolate their kids from teachers who are one of the most important watchdogs for abuse and neglect. Plus they get a nice tax rebate at the end of the year.
I'm betting the Church of Satan comes in to make a point.There is no way that deal is upheld. When you have the State Attorney General telling you it's unconstitutional you're on shaky ground to start. I wouldn't be too concerned about this one. And if somehow it is upheld, just try to open up an Islamic School and let the fun ensue.
I'm partial to the Flying Spaghetti Monster myself.I'm betting the Church of Satan comes in to make a point.
There is no way that deal is upheld. When you have the State Attorney General telling you it's unconstitutional you're on shaky ground to start. I wouldn't be too concerned about this one. And if somehow it is upheld, just try to open up an Islamic School and let the fun ensue.