- Messages
- 7,628
- Points
- 29
Just saw this in the news:
When President Trump on Tuesday declared before the United Nations General Assembly that his administration has accomplished more than “almost any” other administration in U.S. history, the audience of dignitaries and world leaders broke out in audible laughter. “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK,” the president added to additional chuckles.
Just saw this in the news:
When President Trump on Tuesday declared before the United Nations General Assembly that his administration has accomplished more than “almost any” other administration in U.S. history, the audience of dignitaries and world leaders broke out in audible laughter. “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK,” the president added to additional chuckles.
Just saw this in the news:
When President Trump on Tuesday declared before the United Nations General Assembly that his administration has accomplished more than “almost any” other administration in U.S. history, the audience of dignitaries and world leaders broke out in audible laughter. “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK,” the president added to additional chuckles.
Now there is this -
Trump claims he wanted the UN to laugh at his speech, calls it 'great'
https://mashable.com/article/trump-un-laughter-response-joke/#Thy_6wvSYiqu
https://www.forbes.com/sites/shelli...ald-trump-the-new-ugly-american/#16b8ae481412“The Ugly American” – a phrase made famous by the 1958 political novel about U.S. policy in Southeast Asia by Eugene Burdick and William Lederer –
can no longer refer just to the prototypical loud, ignorant American.
Today the title has taken on a real human face, and that is the face of Donald Trump.
Now there is this -
Trump claims he wanted the UN to laugh at his speech, calls it 'great'
https://mashable.com/article/trump-un-laughter-response-joke/#Thy_6wvSYiqu
If he intended to tell a joke here, the only conceivable way could be is as irony. As in he's really saying "In less than two years, my administration has accomplished more than almost any administration in the history of our country.....,NOT!" Seriously, is there some other way to interpret a joke in those words?Trump to UN said:"In less than two years, my administration has accomplished more than almost any administration in the history of our country,"
Hey...it could be plausible evidence in his favor...though if you have a working brain, you know its a bullshirt tactic.Wow, WTF. Kavanaugh's team unveiled his summer calendar from 1982 detailing where he was in order to show he wasn't at the party.
That is absolutely INSANE. A. What high school kid even keeps a calendar, let alone one that detailed? B. Who keeps such a thing for 36 freaking years?! I mean that alone implies guilt right? "Oh yeah, I forgot I sexually assaulted that girl in 1982. Better keep that calendar for when I need to prove my innocence!"
That's a good plan though. Whenever I decide to commit a crime, I'll just pencil in my personal calendar that I wasn't there! Can't be guilty then right?!
With the calendar saving deal the whole virgin thing is becoming more plausible.
Trump calls on Kurdish reporter by saying 'Mr. Kurd'
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...lls-on-kurdish-reporter-by-saying-mister-kurd
Mr. Kurd, meet Mr. Turd.
I now know without a shadow of a doubt what my wife means when she says "me too". I am sick.
I am not sure how Kavenaugh thought it was a good idea to come out as a raving lunitic. Honestly, he had to know that he was going to be attacked, he had to know that it was political and partisan, and he knew that he was going to get the support of the R's no matter what. There is really little he was going to gain by going guns smoking at everyone.
He came across as guilty as hell to me. Not sure it matters, but he made himself not look like a SC justice. He looks much more like a Senator or House member, who are much more interested in conspiracy theories and winning points.
The R's can do better for a nominee.
Vote's about to happen. I have it pulled up on CNN right now. Not sure if I really want to watch, though.
It's all up to Jeff Flake at this point. Even if it makes it out of committee, they still don't have the votes IIRC.
Come on Jeff, do something different for a change!
He's calling to delay the floor vote for up to a week for the FBI to continue investigating.
That is somewhat impressive since Flake never sticks his neck out. The deal probably is that Flake, Murkowski, and Collins vote to confirm if the FBI investigation doesn't come up with anything. FBI investigation needs to be initiated by the White House. I don't see that happening. Now we just have to hope that Flake backs it up and goes with a no vote. I don't see that happening.
The president has just said he found Ford's testimony "Very compelling" and that senators should "do what they think is right" when the full senate votes. That's quite a change from some of his previous statements. It sounds like he might be trying to give the senators some political cover if they vote no.
He knows the FBI investigation will lead to something that will give Senators no choice but to go with a "no" vote. He should have pulled Kavanaugh the second the allegations came out and nominated someone else.
once again Democratic voters aren't motivated.
I think the problem with this is that sexual assault isn't a Democrat/Republican issue, it's an issue for EVERYONE. It's not something like abortion, or taxation, or states rights, where there are clear sides to both issues. It's a "this is wrong and it needs to end" type of issue. People on both sides are affected equally by it. IMO, this will shake more than just the Democrat voting base, this will have ripple effects to the GOP base, and most importantly, the unaffiliated base. Straight ticket voting will be a big deal in November, and we'll likely see good candidates at the local level lose because of it.
I get that there isn't a lot of corroborating evidence with Dr. Ford's testimony and allegations, and the FBI investigation will likely not uncover much more than we already know, but if you don't believe her, who will you believe? Sexual assault doesn't always leave visible marks, but it always leaves invisible, indelible ones.
My go-to song when I was homeless and classist assholes were being shitty to me:
Hold Your Head Up-Argent
5 men expressing their disapproval of rape and child molestation in song form. A source of many healing tears for me for a long time as I recovered from my childhood.
Aerosmith - Janie's Got A Gun
Jewel who was briefly homeless because her mother refused to sleep with her boss.
Who Will Save Your Soul
Here is what I don't get. Yes, I believe Dr. Ford's testimony, and I think Judge K really showed his true colors and really displayed "white male privilege" during his testimony, and did not show one ounce of "justice of the supreme court material."
If he is not guilty, as he claims he is, then be bold, and say, "yes, please have the FBI investigate." Investigation may or may not turn up anything new.
Conversely, he could have easily, at the onslaught of the allegations, come and said "this may or may not have happened, I was a partier, and have done things that, upon reflection, I regret. I am sorry if I violated so and so, and being young is not an excuse. I am sorry, and I have learned from my mistakes as a father of 2 girls." He would have gotten more miles by being truthful rather than dodge, deny, deflect. If he were a decent dude, he would withdraw.
I like beer. I'm a half-keg-full kinda guy.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/matt-damon-angry-kavanaugh-grilled-snl-season-opener-n915131
Lindsey Graham August 2016 - speaking about Merrick Garland's nomination: "All they want is a political outcome. Keep this seat open and hope they win the midterms."
Lindsey Graham October 2018 - speaking about Bret Kavanaugh's nomination: "Dems just want to keep the seat open due to politics."
He knows the FBI investigation will lead to something that will give Senators no choice but to go with a "no" vote. He should have pulled Kavanaugh the second the allegations came out and nominated someone else.
Do you think that the FBI did a complete investigation? It sounds like he has been cleared even after multiple accusers. Which poses the question of how much of what has been expressed is true and how much isn't.
As for the beer thing, I think that if the democrats are using this against him that they are hypocritical given the history of Obama or Clinton. However if there is enough to substantiate that an assault did take place, I think it needs to be a unanimous vote against him being appointed to SCOTUS. Personally, I don't know what to think about all of this but one thing is for sure, I believe that we need to structure a society that encourages woman to come forward right away if they are attacked. The long delay in her coming forward makes it more difficult to prove wrongdoing and if he is guilty, he should be held accountable.
Trump made a huge mistake with the Kavanaugh nomination, and you've seen it pop up today with comments from Ben Sasse. Trump blew it with the nomination from the get-go.
Pretending to be a Republican, I think he should have nominated Allison Eid, Amy Coney Barrett or Joan Larsen. Or better yet, he should have gone with lesser-known Margaret Ryan, who also adds military credibility and JAG work. All four of them are hard to take shots at, particularly Margaret Ryan.