- Messages
- 20,893
- Points
- 72
People Who Don’t Understand Downtowns Are Destroying Downtowns
A far-fetched plan to demolish Dallas’s seat of government is threatening the city’s role in the region.
Some quotes:
... leaders say the monumental I. M. Pei–designed City Hall is in such bad shape that the city might be better off tearing it down and relocating the government into vacant office buildings nearby. That could create an enormous plot for the Dallas Mavericks, whose casino-company owners, the Adelson-Dumont family, want to build what Mavs CEO Rick Welts calls a “full-blown entertainment district” around their new basketball arena. One of the team’s owners, Miriam Adelson, has also been lobbying to legalize casino gambling in Texas, raising the possibility that Dallas City Hall might ultimately be razed for a casino—a perfect symbol for our era of civic impoverishment and gambling addiction.
This half-baked vision may be the nation’s worst downtown-revival strategy, and not only because it would destroy the city’s one-of-a-kind Brutalist colossus. The imagined payoff—a brand-new, suburban-style entertainment district—is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what makes downtowns worthy of their designation in the first place.
The push to abandon City Hall is even more reckless. Tearing down the building would trade today’s cost of repair for the cost of demolition, and tomorrow’s maintenance for rent. It would forfeit a purpose-built structure with grounds for public protest, city-council chambers, soaring interior spaces, and a municipal garage for a few vacant floors of office space that no one else wants. It would sacrifice a symbol of the city at a time when downtown’s sense of identity is wavering, to add one more empty lot to a neighborhood that is full of them. It would destroy an irreplaceable piece of America’s cultural heritage to facilitate a real-estate project that could, by the Mavericks’ own admission, just as soon be plopped down by the side of a highway.
I always believed that a city hall needs to be prominent in its location and architecture. The best city halls, and the best city hall locations, become symbols of their city. Consider the following;
I don't have to name the city where these municipal buildings are located; you just know.
Even the little suburban village where I now live has a prominent, centrally located village hall, on its main street.
I've posted rants about how some smaller towns locate their seats of government in nondescript buildings in out-of-the-way locations. They could have had a cute municipal hall in previous years. However, the powers that be thought it would be more cost-effective or efficient to group all municipal functions in a compound with the public works or fire department. This downgrade sends a strong message about municipal government and its relationship to place; there really isn't any. The building just becomes a place where you get a building permit or dog license.
Like I've said before, if you would be ashamed to put the building that's your seat of government in your seal or letterhead, it's probably an awful building.
Without a city hall, Dallas joins this group of small cities and towns that have no pride of place. Scattered office space throughout downtown, or metal building, it sends the same message.