Don't get me wrong, my upbringing was blue collar all the way - the work ethic, the "down to earth" mentality, etc. are all selling points in their own way.
But - when Akron's own citizens refer to Akron as a "blue collar town", they completely discredit the amenities I referred to in my first post. It also alienates anyone who might consider Akron but is skeptical because heaven forbid they prefer a Merlot over a Michelob (just trying to find a simple way to illustrate it). What about Akron's health care industries - do you think they like to hear that "Akron's just a blue-collar town" with the implication that that's the only thing Akron has to offer?
I'm not suggesting that Akron tries to establish itself as an ultra-chic destination - it never will be, thank heavens. But civic leaders, CVBs, etc. are kidding themselves if they think showing a aseball stadium is going to bowl over prospective businesses and residents. People want to know if they can find a livable area, with amenities they would use daily (i.e. if someone was looking for a more upscale environ, point out Highland Square and its proximity to West Point Market (a hi-end grocer), coffeeshops, nightclubs, etc. These are things people will use every day - they won't be spending every single day at the ballgame.
Also - it's inaccurate to say that only 10% of the populace can afford the things I mentioned. As Akron's cost of living is startlingly low, you can live very well on a rather modest income. Believe me, I speak from personal experience.
I agree, it's dangerous for a country to entirely depend on imports but I would be more skeptical about putting my city's hope in industries that have historically fled to areas with cheaper (i.e. more easily exploited) labor. The "yuppie jobs" may not have the "cachet" attached with them, but they tend to pay more and have a little more longevity. I wish the blue-collar jobs were so fortunate.