- Messages
- 23,364
- Points
- 72
Yep. Stupid marketing speak.I initial thought was "really? come on."
It's not a shack, its a tiny house.
Yep. Stupid marketing speak.I initial thought was "really? come on."
I have seen and approved them. I saw the first one 25+ years ago when I was working for my first jurisdiction.The carriage house is dead, long live the barndominium.
It's always DENSE multi-family. Just so you are aware.I professionally cringe and/or eye-roll every time I hear the phrase 'highest and best use'.
?It's always DENSE multi-family. Just so you are aware.
Always a chance to make some progress, helps if planners in your community have some sympathy. We have one in the county known for burning through PDs- nobody's going to fault anybody for a short stay there.Sometimes that trainwreck community is the best place to get your first director/management job as long as you know what you're getting into.
Not my first, but that was the environment I entered into a few years ago. I knew what I was getting into and I had a lot of confidence in the City Manager. We have been able to implement a lot of changes that would have otherwise had substantial pushback of things were not such a train wreck. People agreed that change needed to happen... and that was part of the reason that the position opened up.Sometimes that trainwreck community is the best place to get your first director/management job as long as you know what you're getting into.
I can understand this from a certain perspective, since waterfront/accessible vacation rentals are a not insignificant part of the State's yearly economy.So the State of Michigan may be outlawing bans on Air BnB style short term rentals, thereby superseding all local zoning control.
![]()
Michigan House votes to bar Airbnb bans | Bridge Michigan
The Republican-led House passes legislation that sponsors say protects property rights and one critic says will ‘pour lighter fluid on an already red-hot housing market.'www.bridgemi.com
Emphasis on 'certain perspective'.I can understand this from a certain perspective, since waterfront/accessible vacation rentals are a not insignificant part of the State's yearly economy.
Or have parents/grandparents with last names that end in 'wicz'. CheersGrowing up where I did, though, I know a few words. Including the one on the sign.
View attachment 55570
re: suburbia [T]he growth of the metropolis throws vast numbers of people into distant dormitories where ... life is carried on without the discipline of rural occupations and without the cultural resources that the Central District of the city still retains. [Lewis Mumford, 1922]
Is THIS where the world all went wrong?!??! (Ummm, maybe.)The suburbs perpetuate matriarchy? From the Montreal Gazette, Setember 20 1955:
View attachment 55581
For realz? Why even have the easement then? Just keep it private property.Grant of Sidewalk Easement Developer grants to the City a perpetual easement for public use of the sidewalk(s) to be installed in the Condominium development, designated as the Sidewalk Easement Area in Exhibit A. The Sidewalk Easement Area shall only be used by the public for pedestrian and bicycle passage through the Condominium development to go to and from condominium units. The City shall not have any responsibility to maintain the sidewalks.
I've been on a Civilization 6 binge lately. Anyone else play any iterations of Sid Meier's Civilization series?
View attachment 56432
Like someone trying to chase a specific use out by singling it out for onerous regulation, or someone trying to prohibit a specific parcel of land from being used for anything, or someone who just says "this place is full" and regulates development within its limits into the ground as a result?Land use prohibition by development regulations.
Yep. Though one does have to be careful not to fall into the ‘regulatory takings’ trap.Like someone trying to chase a specific use out by singling it out for onerous regulation, or someone trying to prohibit a specific parcel of land from being used for anything, or someone who just says "this place is full" and regulates development within its limits into the ground as a result?
Like someone trying to chase a specific use out by singling it out for onerous regulation, or someone trying to prohibit a specific parcel of land from being used for anything, or someone who just says "this place is full" and regulates development within its limits into the ground as a result?