Doberman
Cyburbian
- Messages
- 299
- Points
- 11
I had been meaning to touch on this for those interested. I took the PTP earlier this year. The certification is offered and maintained through the International Transportation Engineers and I believe the Transportation Professionals Certification Board. I'm not exactly sure what the relationship is between the two.
I submitted my application exam back when I was Director of Transportation Planning & Development for our county's transit agency. I have since moved on to work in Economic Development. Prior to that role, I was working in urban planning. My employer at the time paid for my application and exam fee. Similar to the AICP, the required years of work experience are based on your education. I believe that your time working in urban planning can count toward the years you need.
The exam itself was 300 questions and broken into two 150 question blocks. I believe you had something like 4 hours to finish the exam with a one-hour break in between.
As you can imagine, the exam was all over the place.
Their website (https://www.tpcb.org/certification/ptp/reference-material/ (Reference Material)) lists several books as reference materials for the exam. Buying all of these books would probably cost you thousands of dollars and time wasted. Of the reference materials, I recommend the Transportation Planning Handbook, Engaging People through Outreach and Organization. Public Involvement Techniques for Transportation Decision Making, all of the TCRP reports they recommend, Transportation Impact Analysis for Site Development, Context Sensitive Solutions in Designing Major Urban Thoroughfares for Walkable Communities, Neighborhood Street Design Guidelines, and The Geography of Urban Transportation. I also read through Urban Travel Demand Modeling, I would do this just for the concepts, you won't have to solve these types of complicated math problems on the exam. I did not read Parking Generation and I have a feeling I missed a good bit of those questions. If you aren't familiar with transit beyond a surface-level understanding, you may also want to read TCRP 100.
There were also a few questions related to project management that looked like they belonged in a PMP exam. Also, some questions related to GIS concepts.
I do not recommend purchasing the practice exams or the refresher course. These are fairly expensive and did not help me in the least.
While there is some math in the exam, it's not an engineering exam. Most of the math I saw looked like it was stats and Algebra 2 at the most. There were a few off-the-wall questions that asked you to calculate the useful life cycle in dollars for a bridge using linear regression, I just guessed on this one and moved on.
Since I've moved from Transportation Planning to Econ. Dev., I can't say that it's helped my career a ton in that regard. It is nice having some letters behind your name even if you have to explain to people what they mean. I do think the course material can help you be a little more technical in what you do and what you know. Unfortunately, many of my colleagues in the econ. dev. field are not very technical and more interested in
, going to trade shows and taking pictures with golden shovels. While I would not pretend to have the same skillset as an engineer does, I do think I'm able to have better and more informed conversations about infrastructure with them now.
If you have any questions please let me know.
I am working on the CECD now and hope to take the AICP at some point.
I submitted my application exam back when I was Director of Transportation Planning & Development for our county's transit agency. I have since moved on to work in Economic Development. Prior to that role, I was working in urban planning. My employer at the time paid for my application and exam fee. Similar to the AICP, the required years of work experience are based on your education. I believe that your time working in urban planning can count toward the years you need.
The exam itself was 300 questions and broken into two 150 question blocks. I believe you had something like 4 hours to finish the exam with a one-hour break in between.
As you can imagine, the exam was all over the place.
Their website (https://www.tpcb.org/certification/ptp/reference-material/ (Reference Material)) lists several books as reference materials for the exam. Buying all of these books would probably cost you thousands of dollars and time wasted. Of the reference materials, I recommend the Transportation Planning Handbook, Engaging People through Outreach and Organization. Public Involvement Techniques for Transportation Decision Making, all of the TCRP reports they recommend, Transportation Impact Analysis for Site Development, Context Sensitive Solutions in Designing Major Urban Thoroughfares for Walkable Communities, Neighborhood Street Design Guidelines, and The Geography of Urban Transportation. I also read through Urban Travel Demand Modeling, I would do this just for the concepts, you won't have to solve these types of complicated math problems on the exam. I did not read Parking Generation and I have a feeling I missed a good bit of those questions. If you aren't familiar with transit beyond a surface-level understanding, you may also want to read TCRP 100.
There were also a few questions related to project management that looked like they belonged in a PMP exam. Also, some questions related to GIS concepts.
I do not recommend purchasing the practice exams or the refresher course. These are fairly expensive and did not help me in the least.
While there is some math in the exam, it's not an engineering exam. Most of the math I saw looked like it was stats and Algebra 2 at the most. There were a few off-the-wall questions that asked you to calculate the useful life cycle in dollars for a bridge using linear regression, I just guessed on this one and moved on.
Since I've moved from Transportation Planning to Econ. Dev., I can't say that it's helped my career a ton in that regard. It is nice having some letters behind your name even if you have to explain to people what they mean. I do think the course material can help you be a little more technical in what you do and what you know. Unfortunately, many of my colleagues in the econ. dev. field are not very technical and more interested in
If you have any questions please let me know.
I am working on the CECD now and hope to take the AICP at some point.