I've thought about starting this thread... but I figured I would let someone do it
I am a die-hard Fighting Illini fan, and a student at U of I...
There are two debates going on at Illinois:
The first one is the nickname itself, the Board of Trustees has said repeatedly that "Fighting Illini" is the schools nickname, and it will not change.
The second is "Chief Illiniwek", a "symbol" of the athletic teams. (Most people are careful not to call him a mascot, because he does not roam the sidelines during the game like most mascots, and there is a desire to distance ourselves from schools like Wisconsin, MSU, etc, that have goofy mascots, even though it is basically semantics)...
Personally, i think we should probably just quit doing the halftime show, (even though the costume was a gift from a Native American tribe back in the 80's..

) and wipe all visual references to NA culture from our uniforms and merchandise.
Illinois has not had the "chief" logo on uniforms for a number of years, instead using a Block I logo
---
What does the NCAA ruling mean?
It does NOT mean we have to change our nickname, or stop having the Chief,
It means that we cannot reference NA culture during NCAA tournaments, and we cannot host NCAA tournament events as long as we have a native american mascot.
this is potentially very damaging to our athletic program, because we routinely host Volleyball, Soccer, and Tennis matches in the early rounds of the NCAA tournament.
----
BTW, I am actually kinda surprised...
with the liberal leanings of most of the posters here, i am kinda astonished that almost nobody has wholeheartedly agreed with this ruling.
What is curious about this whole thing is the following:
1.) How is what we (Illinois) do any different than say, the Michigan State Spartans or the USC Trojans. Both schools reference a culture that is not indicitive of their own, and Illinois doesn't have some stupid foam mascot dancing around.
2.) Why is NCAASports.com still selling Illinois merchandise, including "Chief" logo merchandise???
3.) Why is San Diego State (Aztecs) not on this list? their website references Montezuma and Aztec culture frequently on their "Traditions" page... is it ok to be "hurtful" to Mexican Indians?